ON1 is a joke - hand is completely destroyed, a lot less details in girl's face, weird green colour shift.
#ON1 PHOTO RAW VS CAPTURE ONE SKIN#
Details in hair of a girl and skin texture of an adult are significantly better in LR conversion. I think LR wins, followed by C1 and ON1 being laughable. Everything else is "as shot" including white balance.
How much details can we recover ? All that I used was Exposure and Highlights sliders.
So - how do they handle overexposed photo ? This is scene severely overexposed with flash. I was interested in how do these programs cope with difficult scenes, not some perfectly exposed daylight portrait where anything will do but stuff that's heavily over/under exposed or noisy or with strong backlight etc. I have C1 free for Sony and this works really well for Sony image vs LR. I agreed C1 done great job with the colour it seems for shadow recovery by not bringing up too much magenta/green. So, I think I have to give C1 a slight edge against LR this time - mainly because it handled colours much better. On the other hand if you look at C1 noise reduction around the dog it looks bad. Noise reduction is a tough one - I don't like the fact that with LR I couldn't get rid of big white pixels on the dog without going crazy on luminance which makes it big smudgy blob. LR did weird colour shift this time, black fur goes into magenta. So to get it out of the way - ON1 is laughing stock again.Īs to C1 vs LR it's kind of hard for me to decide. That's how the photo looks like without touching it at all:Īnd what I could achieve with RAW converters: I used Exposure, Shadows and Noise Reduction sliders in all 3 programs. So to follow it with a extreme shadow test, that is a photo (100% crop) of a black dog underexposed by about 4 stops.
0 kommentar(er)
